Are You the Victim of Police Misconduct?
Were you wrongfully accused of a crime and falsely arrested because of racial profiling? Was your home searched by officers without a valid warrant? Did you lose a loved one because a law enforcement official deployed a firearm, despite the fact that the victim was unarmed?
If you can answer ‘yes’ to any of these questions, then you may have suffered from police misconduct. As a victim, you may be entitled to compensation and may benefit from seeking legal counsel with a police brutality lawyer. That’s where we step in to assist.
We offer access to an extensive network of leading police misconduct lawyers who have the knowledge, commitment, and litigation experience it takes to protect your rights and win a case. Our site provides free links to some of the best and most acclaimed lawyers across the United States who have successfully handled police misconduct lawsuits and who will stop at nothing until you and your family obtain justice. Browse our site to learn more about the lawyers practicing in your area, including their background, case history, and areas of expertise, so you can choose the legal representative that best serves your needs.
Superior legal counsel is just one click or phone call away. Search for an attorney today so you can be on your way to filing a police misconduct claim and obtaining the money damages you deserve.
What is Police Misconduct?
We often hear the term “police misconduct”, but what exactly does it mean? Police misconduct occurs when an officer of the law acts in a manner that is beyond the scope of their abilities. In most cases, this equates to the use of “excessive force”, otherwise referred to as any action or measure taken by an officer than is considered unreasonable. Unreasonable force can include a wide range of incidents and actions, such as racial slurs, sexual harassment, and the infliction of unnecessary physical harm upon an individual.
Below are some common examples of police misconduct that victims can seek legal representation for with the help of an experienced police brutality attorneys:
- Attacking an inmate
- False arrest
- Falsification of evidence
- Harassment (verbal, physical, or sexual in nature)
- Illegal search and seizure
- Racial profiling
- Shooting an unarmed suspect
- Tampering with a crime scene
- Unethical use of firearms (including tasers and guns)
- Wrongful death
- Wrongful imprisonment
The Truth About Police Brutality and What You Can Do About It
Police officers have a responsibility to protect civilians against crime and acts of injustice. Yet, many times, it is the officers themselves who are violating the law. When police behave in a manner that is excessively violent, harass potential suspects, or fatally wound an individual who was unarmed and did not display intention to harm another, they have committed a crime.
Fortunately, victims of police misconduct and police brutality are protected by Federal Law. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, which includes the use of excessive force by law enforcement officials. Officers are also prohibited from displaying discrimination against individuals over race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. Anyone who has experienced an incident in which an officer went beyond the scope of “reasonable force” to detain them or used violent measures during an arrest or property search has the right to seek legal assistance with police brutality attorneys.
Contact one of our featured brutality attorneys today to schedule a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss your options in filing a case and ensuring your civil rights are fully protected.
According to the Washington Post — who attempted one of the most comprehensive analyses of data around the nation — in 2016, 963 people were shot and killed by police in the US. Although African Americans make up only 13% of the population (encompassing 242 of the estimated nearly 1000 killed this year), this means that they made up as much as 25% of those killed by police. In 2015, 30% of the African Americans who lost their lives to a police officer was unarmed. And less than one-third of 2014’s African American fatalities at the hands of police were allegedly armed, but were not suspected of committing a violent crime.
One claim often made is false arrest. When someone makes a false arrest claim, they maintain that a police officer has violated their Fourth Amendment right prohibiting unreasonable seizure. If an officer has “probable cause,” however, it will not be ruled that the plaintiff’s rights have been violated. Police officers can lawfully arrest someone they suspect may be engaging in criminal activity without having a warrant for a misdemeanor or felony committed.
If the information that the police officer was working with is found to be false, the police officer still cannot be charged with a crime. The only way to prove a false arrest case is to prove that the officer did not have probable cause to make an arrest. Probable cause means that any person in the same situation would reasonably assume that a crime was committed.
To make a malicious prosecution claim, the victim must prove that their Fourteenth Amendment right to liberty has been violated. There are four things that a plaintiff must prove to win a malicious prosecution case:
● The police officer against whom the allegations are made commenced a criminal proceeding
● The proceeding ruled for the victim
● There was no probable cause
● The proceeding was initiated with malice
If the defendant police officer can prove that he had probable cause, then the claim will be denied.
Excessive force cases usually get the most attention. Because they are so egregious, they usually are highly publicized because they generally lead to severe injury or even death. A subjective criteria, the determination of what is “excessive” is based on the facts about the events and its circumstances. The intent of the officer has no bearing on whether they are found guilty of excessive force or not. But if the officer had good intentions and the force is still found to be excessive, then the proceedings will continue.